Find a Lawyer

FARIDOON KHAN versus SARFARAZ

According to the evidence regarding the filing of the case for Sections 6 and 13, it is disclosed that the plaintiff / pre-emptor produced the pond according to the terms of section 13 of the North-West Frontier Province Pre-Impression Act, 1987. Making records was successfully proven. Minor witnesses, as well as themselves, appeared as witnesses with the informant `Talwam Siddibet ',` Seek Ish Ashid' and `` I seek happiness '' on the record, but the appellate court adopted a hypertensive approach and was unimportant. Importantly, to the slightest slip of the plaintiff's witness's language, so extensive evidence was rejected without any valid ground, that the plaintiff / Wendy did not emphasize in his written statement or in his court statement that he was abroad at that time. Malik was when `` Talib al-Shahid's notice was received '' by the appellate court itself, and without his evidence, his assertion was unlawful. It was declared that the defendant was abroad, so the notice of `e-petition was not submitted to him and he did not accept. The appellate court's assertion was in violation of the principle of law, justice, equality and fair play, and it was also illegal that the trial court's decision under the trial court's decision was also invalid. Is based on reasonable definition of reasonable reasoning and evidence, and the appellate court had no jurisdiction to interfere with any material that the appellate court had not properly examined and was not referred to. , Which resulted in obvious injustice, in which only clear mistakes, contradictions and dishonest reforms were introduced. Evidence of testimony, untrue advocate from Khushal Kot lawyer