Section 2 302 (b) Qatil Amad failed to establish his presence at the place of testimony of eyewitnesses, the previous enmity between the parties, if any, the witnesses' statements were full of contradictions and contradictions. The testimony was recorded far beyond the time the most impossible and incredible FIR was recorded when it was shown that the post mortem examination of the deceased was delayed for 21 hours with no explanation. The witness did not confirm, eye witnesses did not see the incident. Neither he was there nor did he have any motive that the accused's involvement in the case was doubtful and the murder charge against him was speculated that the ocular account was false, extremely unwanted and untrustworthy. Was declared because of which it was immoral and unprofessional. Interested witnesses failed to set a motive for the prosecution's evidence against the accused, a positive report from the firearms and forensic science laboratory at the instance of the suspects indicated that the crime with the firearm was clear, To no avail, when the prosecution's case against the accused, otherwise, the accused was acquitted while standing. Conditions
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
