The delay in dismissing the trial charges against Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 murder convictions, joint intention bail, accused and accomplices was that they attacked the complainant and killed the victim. Was charged. The firing of the two firearms on the body of the accused was a contradiction between the ocular account and medical evidence, according to witnesses. The wound was sore. Given that no specific progress had been made towards the end of the trial and that the accused was not responsible for the delay, and that the defendant was a former offender, the reasonableness of the order sheet revealed that only a postponement counsel Caused by a request for The accused and all other delays were due to the absence of prosecution witnesses or the lawyers' strike, for which the accused could not be held responsible, the accused did not show the date of involvement in the criminal cases and One was a former culprit. Already spent more than 2 years, 4 months and 14 days in jail, and was not a desperate and dangerous criminal, the accused's bail plea was granted and he was granted bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
