Section 2 (b (b) / Q 34) Qatil-e-Amal, The Joint Intent Evidence Definition The benefit of the doubt was not available to any witnesses to the incident and the prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence, which included Wajitkar. ; Purpose Extra-judicial confession; Pistol retrieval and Forensic Science Laboratory's positive report was recorded five days after the incident on the sole evidence of Wajitkar and no explanation was given for the delay, the presence of the site plan The witness / Vajitkar had the evidence that I was not shown. Dependent on the death of a doctor or a hospital staff member The case was not made in the presence of R, nor was it prosecuted by a police officer who could hardly be named as the prosecutor's witness, the victim's real brother. The evidence of legal proceedings in connection with the statement was not credible under the circumstances; the witness for the alleged extra-judicial confession did not, in his statement, give the date or time of the alleged extra-judicial confession; The day after the incident was recorded; without any plausible explanation for such delay, the prosecution's witness said, And could be an important post / was appointed, nor affect any agreement between a man and a member nor the complainant had no influence on the party which accused persons and complaints. The confession, under these circumstances, was not as dependable as was alleged by the prosecution, in which case the pistol was allegedly recovered from the suspect's possession 8 days after his arrest.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
