Section 2 302 (b) / Q 34 Qatil-e-Alam, Definition of Evidence Benefit of the Shakuk The prosecution witness's son-in-law's son-in-law had a deep connection with the complaining party and could not justify his presence at the time of the incident. ? The prosecution's witness said that although there is no enmity with the accused, the absence of enmity with the accused witness will not mean that what he has said is taken as the truth of the gospel and the truth of the messenger. The court will have to see that the statement of the prosecution's witness was trustworthy and credible to the extent that the role assigned to the accused was not named in the FIR, but later in the case the statement Or any specific mark of the accused's identity was not mentioned in the FIR. The presence of witnesses was not described at the time of the identification parade, which was always considered a natural defect in the prosecution's evidence. In the circumstances the parade of the accused was meaningless, there was no vacancy at the scene of the incident, and forensic science The laboratory report was only to the extent that the pistol was in working condition, the recovery of the pistol from the occupation of the accused was of no use. The evidence of the sole witness for the prosecution was not affected by the conviction and the accused's prosecution case in the case was very suspicious; the accused's recovery of the pistol from the accused's possession, he did not link it to the alleged crime, the prosecution failed to prove In addition to the trial, the charges and the conviction of the accused against the accused in the trial, the benefit of his suspicion was increased and the accused was released.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
