Find a Lawyer

MST. IMTIAZ AKHTAR versus HABIB BANK LIMITED, SIALKOT

Section 19 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Implementation of an Order by the Sale of Mortgage Property 22 197 Based on a 1975 decree, the court lenders claiming to own such property The pass was protected under Rule 1 2. In 2001, a petition was filed under section 12 (2), CPC, against the alleged arbitrators of the judgment, under which the Decree 229 1975, which was later decided The banking court was dismissed for failing to present the debtor. Defendants filed by Defendants by applying under Section 12 (2), CPC 28 years after the Defendants, by the Defendants claiming to be co-owners in such property. The previous decision, in conjunction with the debt of 5, was obtained on 2002 2002. And the creditors of the decision were the closest relations to each other, the interlocutors had filed an illegal objection to the bank's right to frustrate the bank's decision against the accused. rt rightly ignored any earlier decision in the case dated 22 5 2002 in which the High Court dismissed the appeal in the circumstances. jobs for advocates from Chiniot lawyer