MST. NASEEMA, SALAHUDDIN versus MST. DAULAT FATIMA
Sections 12 and 35 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 2 (2), 152, 148, AX, R1 and O. XXI, R 34, 35, suit for specific performance of a contract to sell real estate. Such a suit is a fixed time for the deposit of the sale price and results of removal of the case have been provided in case of failure to comply with the order. The extension of such order was not the first of its kind, but rather For all intents and purposes the court of nature was final. Section 148, CPC had no jurisdiction to extend the rule of function as an opioid, such rule was not absolute, but was subject to certain exceptions, including the binding of decree or the act of court. Including an outside situation that impedes compliance. When decisions and decrees were finalized, the time provided in the original decree for such collection began at the same time, when the correction was allowed and the example of principle and exception
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
