IFTIKHAR AHMED versus PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
Section 2 (c) (iii) and 12 Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 25A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Complaint dismissed by employees Employees' request was that neither charge sheet Does not exist. There was an investigation. The appointment of the inquiry officer was issued by the personal manager, who was not an employer within the meaning of section 2 (c) (iii) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Establishment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968. And in the inquiry report, the signature of the inquiry officer was forfeited, which was rejected by the Labor Court requesting the complaint, under which the order was upheld by the appellate court, under which the court It was time to find out that the charge sheet was presented and answered. And the inquiry was made and the allegations were proved. The record shows that the personal manager was under the general manager, who was responsible for the establishment's owner and it has been revealed that the general manager had approved the charge sheet with the approval of the general manager. The action taken by the appellate court regarding the appointment and comparison of the inquiry officer, signed the inquiry report which was the inquiry officer's High Court while the constitutional plea hearing would not be contrary to that. Court dismisses constitutional plea
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
