MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus THE STATE
Article 426 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), 30 302 The sentencing trial trial court did not believe in the motive for the incident and found that it was the victim who came to the playroom of the accused before any incident. And the incident didn't exist. Suddenly there was a case of fighting and such a severe punishment was not confirmed, was not without substance and evidence needed deep appreciation; in the circumstances, it would require re-examination and re-emergence as male. The sentence was a request for a suspension. Allowed, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Hafizabad lawyer
