Find a Lawyer

SUFI GHULAM RASOOL versus CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, LAHORE

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4, 5 (2), 199 and 212 General Clauses Act (X of 1897), Section 24, The approval of a constitutional petition pension duty and the obligation of public workers to retire from the inactivity of public servants. Subsequently, the authorities submitted their pension papers to the authorities, but after the authorities finalized the case of one or another pretext government employee, the government employees filed a constitutional petition alleging that the administration He was fined due to inactivity, which challenged the retention of the application in the presence of the bar. Despite the restriction contained in Article 212 of the Constitution read with Section 4 of Article 1212 Service Tribunals Act 1973, the High Court had the power to direct public workers to act in accordance with Article 4 of the Constitution. Give up Under Article 199 of the Constitution, the responsibility and responsibility of deciding the representation of the public representatives should not be dismissed by any officer, without the fear, kindness and interference of the public officials within a reasonable time. Should public workers be obliged to act in accordance with the law, which was the mandate of the Constitution in view of Article 5 (2) of the Constitution? Even after my retirement in public service, called retirement benefits, pension grants were the most valuable of such benefits. The authority concerned was instructed to provide the appropriate hearing within the stipulated time period of the public servant. law websites from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer