Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL versus THE STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 324/34 Guarantee, the role of the accused further investigation resulted in the injuries to the left leg of the injured and the right foot of the shots fired by the co-accused. Were planted on The injured sitting had indicated that he had no intention of killing the wounded or if he had intended to kill the injured, he could have targeted key parts of his body. The settlement was delayed in the submission of the invoice or at trial. The trial court observed, dismissing the bail plea of the accused, that for the last one year the third and fourth provisions left behind the jail bars, after repealing section 497, CRPC through the amendment ordinance 2001. Was not available. 10 2001, which would mean that before the commission of the third and fourth provisions of section 497, the CCC was deleted, the accused could not claim any such exception, in dismissing the case. The delay had to be investigated by the C. ust And the court had to see who was responsible for causing the delay because the main duty of the court in the administration of criminal justice was that the accused was not delayed, that was a matter worth considering, in cases, further investigation. Was accused of. Under the circumstances, the bail was filed tax advocates from Gujar Khan lawyer