Find a Lawyer

SYED ALI SHAH BUKHARI versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Government employee, a Deputy District Attorney, was essentially retired from the job when he was appointed to the District Court of Additional District Judge, He took Rs. 3,000 from the lawsuit in the name of the presiding officer and took offense under the meaning of Section 3 (b) (c) of removal of the Government from Punjab under the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000. And corruption has been committed, the authorized authority of 2000 ordered under the ordinance to launch an inquiry against the accused public servant and provide him with a statement of the charges. Or employee of a government inquiry officer submitted his written defense denied such charges, the inquiry officer concluded a detailed inquiry, the check-party witnesses, and the result. That the accused was a civil servant accused and gave a copy of his mandatory retirement recommendation to the competent authority for the reason. After complying with Section 3 (2) of the Ordinance, a notice was given to the competent authority of the public servant; the public servant imposed a mandatory retirement penalty on the public servant, with all the pension benefits, against which he entered the service tribunal. Appeal was filed before. The complainant moved the Anti-Corruption Establishment against the civil servant, but with that he came under the pressure of witnesses and hoped that the Anti-Corruption Establishment not only halted the proceedings but nevertheless the accused Government employee. The bribe received will be returned to him. Section 182, proceedings to initiate proceedings against the complainant under PPC criminal advocate from Morgah lawyer