LIYAR KHAN versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR/A. C., SWABI
Sections 4, 6, 18, 23, 30 and 54 do not provide any evidence on the reference record of the acquisition of the land to show that there is a probable value of the acquired land based on which the amount of compensation is increased. Can be said but only stated that other lands in the vicinity were sold at a higher price, but they failed to produce any party in support of the claim as a witness in the above transaction, only the preparation of a copy of the mutation , Was completely insufficient to prove that the value entered in the mutation was correct and the rightful landlord was obliged to pay I believe that anyone in this transaction. On which they depended that the scrutiny of the evidence on record constituted the decision of the Land Acquisition Judge before the reference was filed, which was well on the question of eligibility as well as limitation. Appeal filed against land acquisition judge's decision, filed without qualification, dismissed, in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
