Find a Lawyer

MST. SHAH TAREEN BEGUM versus HOUSE BUILDING FINANCE CORPORATION

Sections 30 (1A), 30 (10) and 24 House Building Finance Corporation Regulations, 1979, Regulation 17 (2) Transfer of Property Act (IV 1882), Sections 41 and 52 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 47, 96 and A. XXI, R 58 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Article 156 Land Record Manual, Arts 7 18 and 7 32 Mortgage Property Purchase by Respondent's Proposal and Partnership by House Building Finance Corporation The house was mortgaged on a related question. And the mortgagee failed to pay the financing facility in accordance with the stipulated terms, the corporation approved an order for the delivery of a delivery order to a petition filed under section 30 (1A) of the House Building Finance Corporation Act 1952. Filed application for. During the petition for vacant possession of the mortgage, which was accepted, the appellant directed the auction of the house, upon filing an application for execution by the corporation that purchased the house. In response to the question, the appellant, who claimed to be the landlord's buyer, had filed a claim that he had satisfied himself with the defendant's foreclosure ownership in the Revenue Record. Bought the house and since the mortgage was not affected. Revenue records, he may not know about home mortgage. The home buyer has claimed that he is a good buyer of the house, his right should be protected under section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, if the entries in this regard were canceled. The tax was not made on the record for the mortgage in favor of the corporation, the corporation ask a advocate free from Mangla lawyer