Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. versus REHMAN NAWAZ

Sections 4, 18, 23 and 54 Land Acquisition Determination Compensation Referred to the Court Landlords are not satisfied with the amount paid by the Collector, after the matters have been settled, a petition has been sent to the referee court. Done. And the amount of land acquired by recording the parties' pro- and contradictory evidence, and the determination of compensation by the collector collecting its judgment and decree, is considered a barani, when the fact is that The land was not barren, but there was no sale case in the Chahi Land Trial Court. In the case where the land was acquired, the court had to rely on the cost of adjunct disposition and one year the average price had to be worked out at the average price and the same price was fixed based on the evidence available not only on the record. But it was close to it. The value of the land was referenced by the referee court, considering the one-year average of adjacent Mojas A. The ND properly compensated the acquired landowners, not reading evidence of any illegal interference / interference guarantee. In the case of, the appeal against the decision of the referee court was dismissed ask a advocate free from Multan lawyer