Find a Lawyer

ROBINA GUL versus INAM KHAN

Article 5 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application dispute alleges marriage, the plaintiff's evidence refuses to marry defendant with the defendant allegedly the marriage was alleged and took place in the house of the plaintiff where his The plaintiff's father and other relatives were present, the present defendant presented a witness who was told the plaintiff's counsel and he had given the consent of the plaintiff for the marriage. The plaintiff's record failed to prove that the witness was a witness In the presence of the plaintiff was appointed as a lawyer and no witness was presented to prove that the plaintiff had brought him up. The lawyer appointed a witness who claimed that he was a young boy of 25/26 years, who had no relationship with the plaintiff in the prohibited degree, nor had any close relatives nor his Was a resident. Jurisdiction Family Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, but the appellate court allowed the appeal and the case was dismissed. Then, such a lawyer could not wonder: Qibla Plaintiff failed to prove marriage consent by the plaintiff when the consent of the woman was lost or obtained through consolidation. And the pressure, such a marriage was not a valid marriage, under the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court set aside the appellate court's decision and the family court was restored, in which case constitutional application was allowed. family advocate from Shadiwal lawyer