Find a Lawyer

MEHMOOD HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

There was no direct or indirect evidence on the record of testimony of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Section 10 Proof to show that the accused was a corrupt official and had accumulated large sums of money using his public office. The record was not proved by the sources. That the alleged beneficiaries are in possession of the property described as the defendant in charge / citation and they rely on the accused. The prosecution has failed to prove any of the factors of the anonymous transaction such as source consideration, possession or motive. It was alleged that Benimarz had presented a suitable account for the purchase and holding of the property in a lawful manner. how to become a advocate from Phagwar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes