Find a Lawyer

ITBAR GUL versus SHER MUHAMMAD

Section 13 (3) (a) (ii) and 15 Personal Requirements of the Landlord In the encroachment petition filed against the tenant, it states that it not only needs to shop with good faith but also for its use and occupancy. Not only the affidavit, but also his numerous exams, stated that he was unemployed and needed his shop with good faith and good faith for his own use and occupation. The homeowner's statement to her in such a lengthy trauma remained unmistakable. Remained unaffected, exceeded, or rejected, and which was consistent with the proceedings in the eviction petition, was sufficient to prove the landlord's dishonesty even if the landlord had no other tenants. The shops were rented and did not file a withdrawal petition against another tenant. There are no obvious outlets for questioning for personal use, with the rent controller ordering the tenant to be taken out of many of the tenants' occupied homes to benefit the landlord's personal needs. And such an order cannot interfere with the appeal. advocate for immigration from Mirpur Mathelo lawyer