GHULAM MUSTAFA versus THE STATE
Section 497 Adultery (Ordinance Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 Bail, the defendant's grant claimed that he had entered into a marriage contract with the alleged abductor, but the alleged abductor had joined the accused with his Did not say a word about the alleged marriage. The PC lady described under Section 1 background under the background of which she had been robbed of the house fraudulently and it was said that the accused and her co-accused had allegedly kidnapped her. Had been subjected to illicit intercourse, if any, before the investigating officer. It cannot yet be affirmed and it cannot be preferred that a statement can be filed by a magistrate under section 164,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Ubaro lawyer
