Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SHAH MUHAMMAD versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE


After the hearing of the petition filed for Section 39, 44, 161 and 164 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition, the Collector was also dismissed by the Additional Commissioner. Against the order passed in the Appeal of the Additional Commissioner Member, filed before the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue merely instructed the collector to deal with the issue of review by directing the Board of Revenue to act. The order, which was ambiguous and the review request was not accepted by the Board of Revenue, nor was the order passed by the Collector and Additional Commissioner set aside in an unexamined order passed by the Board of Revenue. No attempt was made to satisfy the arguments presented by the Collector and Additional Commissioner. The Board of Revenue was set aside by the High Court to decide the review.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kotla Pathan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.