Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKMAL KHAN versus THE STATE

Definitions of evidence 302/324/34, the persons involved in both were specifically designated to file an FIR, the prosecution witnesses described the prosecution's story and events in a very natural way and their testimony. Was fully confirmed by medical evidence. The witnesses present on this occasion were very natural and were fully explained. No evidence was found in the medical evidence and it was stated in the ocular account presented by the witnesses that the alleged microscopic details had been attributed to the accused. The other suspects were found to be guilty for some time in a forensic science laboratory report and in another case, 12 bore guns were arrested on charges of eviction. Occasionally seized that the firing was not done, Om said that the carbine, which would mean that the carbine recovered from the suspect's possession was not used, the co-accused failed to explain why he had already escaped with the police. And failed to surrender, the co-accused's reprimanded action is enough for the account holder. The accused was declared with specific injuries. The prosecution was established without any suspicion against any of the two suspects, medical evidence and the recovery of the weapon of crime from their possession was registered as a trial for both cases, but this case After the accident and not being planned in advance, the trial against the accused was not a death sentence, the accused was sentenced to death, according to which he was sentenced to life imprisonment. Done. immigration advocates from Shahkot lawyer