MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus MST. KAKI
Section 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for sale of vacant land by allottee When the previous order for cancellation of land allotment was in the field there was neither allotment party nor the applicant who purchased the land. There was a hearing. The action that resulted in the cancellation of the sale of the land was made seventeen years ago, and it had become a constitutional request for a past and closed transaction, but it could not be excluded on the basis of the mere lakes. , But the High Court intervened so late. Any past and closed deal would result in harassment and would have unfair consequences. The High Court refused to interfere with the exercise of its discretionary constitutional jurisdiction, so far as the sale of the land sold under the order of the Deputy Settlement Commissioner. Was canceled The previous part of the Allottee Settlement Commissioner passed before the matter came to an end, before the cancellation of its allotment, the deputy Settlement Commissioner restored the allotment, including allotment, in favor of the allotment, including allotment by Aloty. The land allotted to the petitioner was sold through a registered sale deed. Subject to a regular implementation check in the Revenue Record Allotment, the applicant's case will fall under the jurisdiction of the pending, eviction property and homelessness section (repealed) Act, 1975. Means, if there is an alternate allotment after inspection. Built in favor of the allottee, the applicant, being the landlord of the above allotted land,
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Farooqabad lawyer