Find a Lawyer

RIAZ ALI versus THE STATE

Articles 940 / / 2020 / / 6868 Pre / 71 Cor Corruption Prevention Act (1947 1947 of II), Section ((2) The testimony of the accused has been appreciated before the Investigation Officer The trial of the accused was given during the examination regarding the production and subsequent statements of the accused. The trial court contradicted each other because he had stated during the examination that when he had obtained the accused to obtain his handwriting / signatures. He was in the hands of a magistrate but was told before the trial court that he was on bail at this time and the accused could not get any benefit simply because he Subsequent statements were made by the Investigation Officer on account of disqualification that the accused was produced before the magistrate in the hands of the accused, as the accused was produced before the magistrate on 8 1 1992, while the investigating officer made the statement before the case. The court could not expect an inquiry officer after more than three years, on 1996, 1996. Keep in mind all the minor details were alleged in his statement under Section 342, CRPC said Did not indicate that the alleged department of hostility, or the hostility from the prosecutor's witness who was the officer of the accused's department, may have accompanied the prosecution's witness That it be dismissed. There was nothing against it in the record to show that there were enough evidence on record to establish all the allegations against the accused, to show that they were dishonestly or on the wrong line. Was convicted and sentenced and his appeal was upheld in the appeal. The case has been pending for a long time and the accused has already been tried patent advocate from Topi lawyer