Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KHALID versus THE STATE

Section 302 (b) / 34/109/148/149 The testimony of the complainant was the mother of the victim and the prosecutor's witness was the son of the complainant and both lived several miles away from the incident and they went ahead without further explanation. I was unsuccessful. At the relevant time, the prosecution had its own case before the police or the trial court on the occasion that the parties were locked in a murder case for the last 20/25 years, during which several persons on both sides lost their lives. Was sitting, including her husband. Both the complainant and the prosecution witnesses were relevant, illogical and opportunistic witnesses in the hands of the accused party, before fully relying on the testimony of such witnesses in a major capital issue. Should seek the material independence of such statements. Some independent sources, who were presently lacking in the case, said the motive for the incident is related to land disputes as mentioned in the FIR. The prosecution was accused of retrieving weapons from the accused, so it was unsafe. None of the recovering firearms can be denied that there is evidence of recovery. The evidence was not proved by the prosecution through any evidence by the prosecution, and the accused was too weak to commit the conspiracy. According to its nature, the medical evidence could not provide the required conflict, no difference was found between the record of the role allegedly caused by the accused and the person responsible for the accused. best law firm from Mirpur Khas lawyer