Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus SHAHZADA AROOJ AWAN

Sections 17 (2) (i) and 24 in the payment of rent from time to time by the default landlord by the tenant-proof tenant claimed that the payment of rent did not constitute any fixed beer. The landlord receives rent from time to time and from time to time receives rent. From the beginning it was a custom that was acceptable to the landlord, in order to establish the process, to prove that the method of payment that was practically proven was uniform, permanent, permanent and permanent. Accepted by the owner without any objection. Or a long-term change if the evidence on the record cannot be completed, but unless this is proved otherwise, it may be considered that from time to time multiple payments for rent will only show this. That such payment was made to the tenant irregularly, in this case, was not successful in showing that the landlord periodically received the rent and Burden began to prove such a decision. He had been practicing it ever since. The CT was entirely on the tenant, but was not successful in this regard, in controlling the rent, the rent controller had rightly ordered the eviction of the tenant. us immigration advocates from Chohar Jamali lawyer