APPEAL NO.C.A. 2312/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 11TH MARCH, 2002. versus APPEAL NO.C.A. 2312/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 11TH MARCH, 2002.
Sections 32 (2), 156 (1) 14 and 81 Section RO 1374 (I) / 98, dated 17 12 1998 Uncertainty, error, etc. False Announcements Disposal of Goods Compensation Detected by Penalty Authorities Customs duty and taxes Consignment and liability 100% of weight was confessed Weight based on the value of the goods, weight on the bill of entry false. The announcement was made explicitly with the intention of avoiding payment duties and taxes, and alleging corruption the Adjusting Officer correctly ordered the confiscation of illicit goods and his release of the Duty 100 off duty. And an equal release of taxes was sought, which in accordance with SAA 1374 (I) / 98, dated 17.12 1998 Could have been done.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Dera Murad Jamali lawyer
