APPEAL,NO.527 AND 528 OF 2001, DECIDED ON 15TH JANUARY, 2002. versus APPEAL,NO.527 AND 528 OF 2001, DECIDED ON 15TH JANUARY, 2002.
Taxes for sections 3, 6, 11, 22, 26, 33 and 34 due to filing of returns and non-payment of sales tax on violations of Sections 3,6,11,22,26,33 and 34 of the Sales Tax. Act, 1990 Order of Fact No Speaker Order There were no facts related to donkeys viewing / taxpayers related facts nor did it explain what was found between the parties. The order did not even mention the reasons for the penalty. / The taxpayers were also not presented with any notice of hearing that the SC / taxpayers were offended by the law without heating and also because it did not meet the requirements of the speaking order which was legal As can be. After the appellate tribunal heard the parties and received the evidence they might like to present, a permanent order was set up by the appellate tribunal for a fresh decision according to the law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Mandi Faizabad lawyer
