C. A. NO. 1998/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 24TH JANUARY, 2002. versus C. A. NO. 1998/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 24TH JANUARY, 2002.
Representatives of the department have no opportunity to hear a previous partial judgment on a seized car that was found in violation of section 15 or section 16 of the Customs Act 1969, custody and confiscation of goods, section 17 and 156 (1) (8). He himself suggested that since the appellant was not initially offered an opportunity to be heard, the decision that the parties may like to make after hearing the parties and after receiving the evidence, according to the law, was a fresh decision. The order for was set aside. Appellate Tribunal accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
