S.T.A. NO. 2755/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 27TH MARCH, 2002. versus S.T.A. NO. 2755/LB OF 2001, DECIDED ON 27TH MARCH, 2002.
Section 11, 34 and 33 Tax Estimation Cell Tax Demand In the opinion of the Adjudicating Officer, the former order RCC / taxpayer with additional taxes and penalties on the supply of cotton seeds and oil cake, has taken the stand that the audit report I didn't see any. The sales tax balance for the relevant year clearly stated in the audit report that to protect the interests of both parties, the sales tax was not against any appraiser / taxpayer appellate tribunal. , So that the order is set aside and rejected. After hearing the parties and getting the evidence they might like to present, the law makes a fresh judgment case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Naukot lawyer
