Find a Lawyer

APPEAL NO. 1474/LB OF 2000, DECIDED ON 14TH FEBRUARY, 2002. versus APPEAL NO. 1474/LB OF 2000, DECIDED ON 14TH FEBRUARY, 2002.

Receipt of Section 36 Section RA 1307 (I) / 97, 20 12 1997 Slate RA 461 (I) / 1999 Taxes on which small payment of tax was imposed or violation of Section 36 of the Sales Tax Act. Was. With the additional increase, the collection of 1990 was not determined by the Judicial Adjustment Officer, suggesting that the sales tax department demands that the original amount of sales tax have been deposited and that the collection can be adjusted accordingly. Instead, sales will be required to be paid under section 36. The tax act, 1990, was abandoned by the Agency of Detection, when the order was passed, the sales tax did not meet the terms of the spelling order passed in terms of section 36 of the 1990 Act, without qualification. Because of this, the appellate tribunal was set aside. According to the law, the decision of the latest decision, after giving due consideration to the candidates arising after the decision on each issue and determining the amount of tax payable. top advocate from Ghari Dupatta lawyer