C.A. NO.95/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 1ST APRIL, 2002. versus C.A. NO.95/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 1ST APRIL, 2002.
Sections 156 (1) and 89 of R135 (1) / 98, dated 17 12 1998 Option to dispose of non-payment of non-realization of cloth and non-examination of textile engineering institute were also not allowed. The Adjudicating Officer was directed to examine the seized cloth in connection with the local origin and also to the fact that the Adjudicating Officer had not conducted a similar test from the Textile Engineering Institute. The textile engineering institute should be traced so that its origin can be ascertained. After being linked to the appellant or his or her representative and the agency investigating the case, after hearing the parties and obtaining evidence which they may like to present, a remand for fresh judgment according to the law was obtained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best advocate from Qalandarabad lawyer
