Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SAMAD versus THE STATE

Section 2302 (b) / 34 34 Definition of evidence was not challenged in the sentence, the location and the reduction of the scene. The witnesses, although related to the victim, had no enmity with the accused and their presence at the time of the incident was proved. Had happened Enough daylighting took place, no question of misidentification of the accused arose, the ocular witnesses were fully supported by the medical evidence and after the facts were recovered the FIR could not be filed. It was reported that the opportunity was recovered. The accused, with a pistol set up by the prosecution in the FIR, was recovered from the moto, the defendant's conviction during the trial proved to be a crime, according to which the deceased was not an innocent al-Dam and the accused and his close relative. Had expressed concern over the matter. For his family honor, which was a matter of reducing the punishment for each of the accused in favor of the death sentence, life imprisonment was granted under the circumstances. law websites from Sikandarabad lawyer