ABDUL NADEEM versus THE STATE
Section 497 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/109/148/149 bail, High Court grant had directed the trial court to direct the trial court to dismiss the accused within six months, But accordingly, the trial is not over. Directed by the High Court, the accused filed a bail plea before the trial court. The trial court dismissed the request for bail with the observation that bail cannot be granted on the basis of legal bail because it was stated that the relevant provisions of the law were removed from the trial, the trial court in fact Was not aware The guarantee that the defendants are being requested to guarantee that the specific direction issued by the High Court is violated, and whenever a special order has been issued by a high court, it is in favor of the accused. Gives birth to a new earth. It should be implemented or some efforts must be made to achieve this goal, but in the present case the trial court did not take any drastic measures to maintain the integrity of the aforementioned direction, which was sufficiently large for the extension of the accused. Was created. A charge of bail was prepared and only a prosecutor's witness statement was recorded in this case, a trial was likely, a lengthy period was spent, and the accused could not be jailed illegally. However, in the certificate of prosecution or the accused, the accused was admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Larkana lawyer