Find a Lawyer

MST. SHABANA KAUSAR versus FARHAN AHMAD

Section 302 Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Defendant's age-defining case N, During the course of the case, a petition was sought for determination of the age of which the trial court accepted. And found that the suspect was underage. And it should be prosecuted in accordance with the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, the trial court's order revising in 2000 that it was less than 18 years old, according to the school's Certificate of Exemption and Registration Department Form B. While the complainant's case was on the accused, the age of the accused was over 18 years. The medical superintendent of the hospital with the consent of the parties was directed to construct a medical board to determine the age of the accused. The medical board concluded that the accused. Age ranges from 20 to 22 years, formed by consensus of medical board parties, accused confesses to medical report The Board could not be raised and it was established that the accused was over 18 years of age at the time of the incident till his general appearance was more than 18 years. done. top advocate from Talagang lawyer