MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, POLICE STATION JATLI
Sections 190, 154, 156, 157 and 173 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of, 1860), Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Report of the accused, produced, discharged after investigation by the accused police Considering the evidence presented without, he said that the complainant magistrate received the report and proceeded to relieve the accused through a verdict without paying attention to the questions involved in the case and acting wisely, Despite the fact that the investigating officer did not find the accused guilty in his report. The report was not binding on the court and despite the recommendation of the Investigation Officer to dismiss the case and dismiss the accused, the magistrate could refuse to exclude the accused and take the matter under section 90, CRPC seriously. But the order of extinction was not done in the present case, there can be no doubt that it could be legally constituted by the magistrate, but W. Hale did so in order to prevent the issue from happening. Passing a meaningful and spoken order, considering all aspects and reasons for excluding the accused Was not excluded from the order of the magistrate's order passed by the magistrate, with whom the High Court did not have a separate case with him. After giving the complainant full opportunity to set up his case in accordance with the law, he is advised to proceed according to law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Zahir Pir lawyer