Find a Lawyer

RAFIQUE AHMED versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR

The plaintiffs filed a suit in connection with the suit land for the proprietary performance and specific performance of the Articles 8 and 42 agreement, and the defendant filed a lawsuit for the specific performance of the contract, which the alleged plaintiff allegedly favored Was hanged, the trial court granted the trial for acquittal and dismissed it. For the specific performance of the agreement, the appellate court overturned the trial case's finding that the defendant had proved in his favor the execution of the sale of the suit land. The plaintiff presented two witnesses to prove the sale agreement in his favor, but there were major contradictions in his statements. Witnesses said the way the contract was drafted and the thumb was allegedly marked by all the people who were executed and the witnesses said, the document stamp paper said The contract was implemented, was purchased from a district other than the district in which the land dispute was located and the distance of the two districts was 40 miles away. , But was purchased by someone else. The plaintiff had neither inspected the stamp vendor nor the person on the back of the stamp paper who had made the same purchase through the executive. For the specific performance of the contract, the trial court for excluding the trial court that was based on the record, the appellate court was more weighty than the appellate court, regardless of the facts on the record, in sketchy and infrequent reasons. Specific activator, on and off the brain family advocate from Bahawalnagar lawyer