Find a Lawyer

SYED MUHAMMAD ZAHIR SHAH versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR

Article 12 ()) Applicant Appointment was designated as a Junior Clerk with no Codal Response Special Response Respondent, who had a good academic ability and had a long experience in junior In all respects there was a better candidate for the position of clerk. But his services were terminated by the service tribunal ordering that the respondent be fully restored as a junior clerk with privileges. The applicant service failed to identify any legal error in the tribunal's decision, and could not present a case involving significant questions. Appeal for leave to appeal for interference of public importance by the Supreme Court under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution lawer from fb area from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer