Article 12 ()) Applicant Appointment was designated as a Junior Clerk with no Codal Response Special Response Respondent, who had a good academic ability and had a long experience in junior In all respects there was a better candidate for the position of clerk. But his services were terminated by the service tribunal ordering that the respondent be fully restored as a junior clerk with privileges. The applicant service failed to identify any legal error in the tribunal's decision, and could not present a case involving significant questions. Appeal for leave to appeal for interference of public importance by the Supreme Court under Article 212 (3) of the Constitution
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
