Find a Lawyer

MUKHTIAR versus THE STATE

Defending section 2302 (b) of the evidence, the defendants' argument was that the Accountant's account was of great interest and exception to the extraordinary evidence so that his case presented evidence to the complainant, only the real brother of the victim. The prosecution's witness, her cousin, did not support the prosecution's case and was declared an enemy. That there was a clear contradiction between ocular and medical evidence, and that the alleged weapon of the crime allegedly used by the accused in the commission of the crime, was not recovered from the possession of the accused because it was badly requested of me. Was. The witness's relationship with the deceased was not sufficient to disprove his testimony, especially when the ocular account presented by the complainant was trusted by both the courts below the ocular account. Was declared. Due to medical evidence, especially through medical evidence, there was a widespread light of recovery and incident from the suspect's place, the question of misidentification was completely eliminated, the motive record allegedly proved, allegedly The admissible witness, in his interim inquiry, was admitted in an unambiguously clear terms. There were disputes between the accused, the defendant and the complainant in connection with the immovable property and the absence of the accused. During the hearing, he also fully involved the accused with the commission of the crime and the contents of the FIR were also being prosecuted. Admitted, in the circumstances, that his case had been fully established even before that. In the shadow of doubts and the trial court correctly the accused famous lower court advocate from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer