Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

RASHIDA BEGUM versus SADI BAIG


Evidence on the record shows that the property was not redeemed through section 7, 8, 22, 25 and 41 homeless persons (Land Settlement) Act (section XLVII of 1958), section 25 local mortgage. The property was a simple mortgage. And it was not captured. Evocians were not physically occupied by the property, which currently continues with residential groups in the property owned only to the extent of the mortgage rights of the plaintiff, while the title to the property. The right to get rid of a mortgage from a mortgage was never extinguished and even if the property was transferred, it would not be subject to the mortgage nor the right to mortgage. In this case, the mortgagee was compelled to seek declaration of property status by referring to section 22 of the Evaki property in accordance with section 22, which was settled by the authorities of the Pakistan Administration of Evacuation Property Act, 1957. Did not have the option to transfer property ownership rights under the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Bhalwal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.