PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL
Article 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) dismissed service was charged with the appointment of a government employee six years later and was dismissed from the job by a government employee under political pressure, the service tribunal appealed to the government employee. Accepted. There was no evidence to support such allegations, no formal inquiry was made to ascertain the fact as the PTC teachers competent authority made such an appointment on the recommendation because a public servant was appointed. He was terminated for six years without service in the Punjab Civil Servant (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1973 as he considered serious and on the occasion of the completion of the required formal proceedings he suffered serious prejudice. Such a dismissal decision has resulted in a miscarriage of justice. Supreme Court dismisses plea for non-warranty error and refuses to grant leave for appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Lawrence pur lawyer