Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN versus SANDOZ (PAKISTAN) LIMITED BAHRIA COMPLEX, KARACHI


The First Schedule, Entry No. 4, 3 Central Excise Rules, 1944, Articles 7, 9, 52, 236 and 238 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), were upheld by the Supreme Court for approval, regardless of entry. According to No. 3 of Schedule I of the Central Excise Act, 1944, Glees, Elites, Millions and Polishes and their sub-organizations came under the scope of entry and were also able to pay such taxes and were responsible for this category. This should also be the scope of entry, even if the authorities have violated RR 7, 9, 52, 236 and 238 of the Central Excise Rules 1944. And were Lucifer and Tenofol CBS X comparable commodities and should be treated the same?

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Sajawal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.