Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL KHAN versus PAKISTAN AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COUNCIL, ISLAMABAD

The termination of pending proceedings in Sections 6 and 2 other forums entails the scope of Section 2A in the Service Tribunals Act 1973, while the issue of employees in its constitutional jurisdiction under the provision of the effect of Section 6, Service Tribunals Act 1973 Was in front of the hearing. While any court has worked to eliminate all pending cases, appeals or petitions, the provisions of this section clearly state that any party within the ninth day of the establishment of the appropriate tribunal, Or prioritize appeal against the application. Such tribunal words say that the establishment of an appropriate tribunal, that section 6 clearly means that whenever a tribunal was established for any person or a class of persons, it should be referred to in this section. Within the stipulated time, a tribunal had to resort to the law itself. Automatically and when it was effected from the very date (10 6 1997) by the insertion of Section 2A in the service tribunals. In the Act, 1973, a forum change took place whenever there was no party to initiate litigation in front of a new forum in any way before the party, so this decision must be waiting for any decision or direction from that forum. Where it was pending for that purpose. In the present case, who filed a constitutional petition before the High Court without waiting for any direction of the High Court or after that, he should have resorted to service tribunal by entering Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act 1973. The Service Tribunal was established for the employee, in the present case, it was applied from 10 6 1997 law firms from Chak 4 b c lawyer