Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN NAQSHBANDI versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

After completion of Section 4 Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), Section 10 (1) Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules, 1974, R7 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Probationer. The termination of service was the applicant's stand for a two-year trial period that such an order could not be approved without issuing a show cause notice. And that at the expiration of two years of the trial period, she automatically stood up to confirm that the tribunal had affirmed the applicant's appeal. The total period of testing under R7 of 1974, the Civil Civil Servant of Punjab, was four years, which was not possible. This will not raise the question of going ahead / automatic certification of because in the absence of any order on completion of the initial two-year completion period, it will be considered that it has been extended for two more years, the applicant did not challenge. It was clear that the extension of the test period, therefore, was clearly accepted, with the termination of the applicant's services with no inaction or mismanagement, including corruption, which would be a matter of simplicity removal. There is no question of issuing show cause notices before such termination. The competent authority was not obliged to issue to the High Court that it could not be compelled to reinstate or confirm the applicant for rehabilitation. Both the food and the certification will depend exclusively on the existing individual's supplementary review. , What aspect of the matter is under the jurisdiction of the High Court, the decision was strictly in accordance with the principles of justice, no question of public importance was involved, the Supreme Court dismissed the petition and their property advocates from Ahmadpur East lawyer