Find a Lawyer

KHUDA BAKHSH versus SHAMS-UD-DIN

Section 13 Tel Abid Asad, the postal receipt by the defendant and the original envelope containing such notice with the identity card received by the plaintiff and adjoining the plaintiff and adjoining the plaintiff, which is alleged to be fake and forged Evidence made by the plaintiff through postal inspection The notice clerk denying such notice confirmed such postal receipt and original envelope in which the postman refused to address such accuracy. Was noted about. The defendant did not accuse the envelope of his address being incorrect, but he was obliged to prove such request in a written statement, but he failed to do so in the address of the plaintiff's envelope. Has been written on the back of which the plaintiff had no fault in sending such notice in the absence of supply which was substantially complied with the provisions of section 13 of the claimant of the Punjab Pre-Impression Act 1991 ? Such pond Ish Asad Sweet was decided in the circumstances. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• Haji ZAHOOR AHMED v. State 2013 YLR 2644
• Mrs. SARDARAN BIBI v. State 2013 YLR 2648
• The STATE through Deputy Director (Assets) Regional Directorate, Anti-Narcotics Force, Lahore v. SHARAF-UD-DIN SHEIKH 2013 YLR 2651
• BANK OF PUNJAB v. RETURNING OFFICER 2013 YLR 2666
• UMAIR ASHRAF v. State 2013 YLR 2683
• HASSAN RAZA BUTT v. State 2013 YLR 2688
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. State 2013 YLR 2697
• MAQSOOD AHMAD v. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF 2013 YLR 2702

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

immigration advocates phone number from Naseerabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes