Find a Lawyer

BANK OF PUNJAB versus RETURNING OFFICER

Ineligible for membership of the Articles 63 (1) (n) and 62 of the Representation of the People Act (LXXXV of 1976) section 14 and 12 of the Shura (Parliament) on the basis that it was a loan secured by his son, It had not been more than a year, that this respondent did not accept, and that he was the only guarantor of the loan agreement by which his son was acquitted, and said Article 63 (1) of the Guarantee Constitution ( G) will not disqualify the defendant under the provisions of the appeal

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• ASHFAQ ASGHAR v. HAFEEZ 2013 YLR 2620
• Haji ZAHOOR AHMED v. State 2013 YLR 2644
• Mrs. SARDARAN BIBI v. State 2013 YLR 2648
• The STATE through Deputy Director (Assets) Regional Directorate, Anti-Narcotics Force, Lahore v. SHARAF-UD-DIN SHEIKH 2013 YLR 2651
• KHUDA BAKHSH v. SHAMS-UD-DIN 2013 YLR 2674
• UMAIR ASHRAF v. State 2013 YLR 2683
• HASSAN RAZA BUTT v. State 2013 YLR 2688
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. State 2013 YLR 2697

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

best law firms from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes