Find a Lawyer

TILA MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

Articles 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the Prohibited Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 Evidence Verification Prosecution was unable to establish with any reasonable certainty whether all three of these defendants. Or, which investigating officer said the drugs were recovered from the suspect's living room, but he said that although the drugs were not physically occupied by any of the suspects, they were present in the tenth part of the suspect's residence. As stated in the statement, all or any of the accused, except the statement of the investigating officer, was not attached to the prohibited occupation. The room from which it was recovered was the accused's bedroom. All three jointly, there was no other evidence in the record that the prosecution could not reasonably prosecute. Doubt, the accused was entitled to the benefit of the doubt immigration advocates email from Thatta lawyer