BAHADUR SAID versus DISTRICT JUDGE/ZILA QAZI TAIMERGARA
After the dismissal of the second petition filed after the dismissal of the petition petition, section 47 and AXXI, R 10, the former petition passed in favor of the plaintiff / order holder remains up to the Supreme Court. Yes, after the petitioner filed an application for execution, the landlord seized the suit and said that the local commissioner for hearing the petition. A second judge's request for an appointment has been filed. The execution was dismissed by the court, but in the review filed by the counsel seeking judgment against the execution court order, it was accepted and the local commissioner was ordered to appoint an appeal court order. Was approved in the review, it was challenged on the basis that there was a prior objection request in the same substance. The second object has already been excluded. Filed an appeal against the dismissal order which was decided by the consent of the parties as the appeal was decided by the parties. The objection was made later, the request for an objection, which was the result of the order, was the convincing opinion of the authorities that there was no postponement at the time of filing the petition, after which it was said that This request was later disqualified under Section 47, CPC, that the object of the objection filed under section 47 within the scope of this decision was CPC, when no request for execution was pending, applicable. Was
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Sikandarabad lawyer