SARWAR versus STATE
Definition of Section 9 (c) Evidence Defendant alleges that while traveling on the bus, Charis was recovered from a wooden box in which the accused claimed ownership and the key was provided by the police officer. The source box was opened because the prosecution's witness confessed. In examining whether the fugitive accused was a real person who owned the chars and the alleged fugitive was a well-known man, the prosecution's witness also admitted that the accused had taken a stand during the interrogation that the accused had been brought to the bus stand. The accused accused, who arranged the ticket for it, was found through the prosecution witnesses in full by the admission of the accused, the confession of the accused was proved to be a crime and the accused was ignorant of the contents of the wooden box. This version was supported by the investigation and the officer consciously owned the narcotic drug He could not be attributed due to s, he alleged, in the circumstances the accused was a man over seventy years old and in the absence of any evidence the benefit of the doubt was extended to the accused, which shows that the accused himself Was involved in drug trafficking and the defendant was sentenced during the trial. Was set aside and acquitted of the charge
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Shemier lawyer