Find a Lawyer

SALMA BEGUM versus COLLECTOR, LAND ACQUISITION

Sections 12 (2), 114 and O XLVII, R 1 submit the request for review under section 12 (2), the CPC was affected by the applicant's counsel, who, on the decision, Had requested a review, praying that the review petition in the case was not maintainable by the petitioner, then considered it as an application under section 12 (2), CPC. Which puts aside unclean judgment and order because was obtained through misrepresentation The applicants' request for validity cannot be accepted because the request for review under which The application under section 12 (2), while the CPC XCLVII was a completely different remedy, the CPC had a separate remedy application, under section 12 (2), the CPC declared fraud, misrepresentation or The jurisdiction was appealed to, while in the present case there was neither action nor any allegation of fraud or question regarding the jurisdiction of the court as the petition for review of the petition under section 12 (2) was made. The only basis for treatment was the CPC, which was a misrepresentation, but said the ground was not available to the applicant. First, there was no specific restriction for the lawyer to affect the applicant's agreement. Secondly, it is said that the lawyer has been empowered by Ntanama to give such a statement. The distinction between deception and misrepresentation was knowledge and intention, because deception advances on the basis of a fact or a claim or a mistake, which informs this fact when it is false. In the context of misrepresentation, the claim or its patent advocate from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer