Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SADDIQUE versus AMEER ZADA KHAN

Applicants questioned the judgment passed by Zail Qazi and the decree under which he dismissed the appeal filed by the applicants for the correctness of the court by the ALLI, R and and the court's ruling and order. And upheld the decision and decision passed by Al Qazi Petitioners. In a nutshell, was disposed of quickly and without the use of an open mind, the decision passed by Zail Qazi showed that he had recorded the result without cause. They could reach the judge caught in this matter, it was necessary to state. The points of determination; the decisions and reasons on this one, enable the party on the one hand and the higher forum on the other side to know how it is equipped and why it was decided against one side and the other. Should not be formal, but rather sufficient and sufficient. By all means and the verdict should make it clear that the judge was aware of the dispute and that the decision was made on a record basis with a free mind, the court order must be a spelling order that the court must establish Was applied. Keeping in mind the resolution of matters involved for their proper decision, Judge Qazi's decision was immoral on his face and the solution to matters related to the free mind was missing, it was said that the verdict on the party's lost case had no effect. Can't give That its case was decided in a fair, fair and lawful manner, in which the High Court put aside the impeachment decision in the review process. In accordance with law, after giving the parties an opportunity to be heard advocate for immigration from Zhob lawyer